California Court of Appeal

Plaintiff's contention that defendant has a duty to defend her against an eminent domain action to condemn her property in fee simple is rejected where the eminent domain proceeding is not a claim made by another, as mentioned in the insurance policy, that triggers coverage.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/30/2004
• Published 07/30/2004

Judges

• RUBIN, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Law Offices of James T. Hudson and James T. Hudson, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Barger & Wolen, Gregory O. Eisenreich and Jennifer S. Yu, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Golden Eagle Insurance Corporation., Ault, Davis & Schonfeld and R. Michael Jordan for Defendant and Respondent Clarendon Insurance Company., McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, Paul J. O'Rourke, Brandon M. Fish and Constance E. Roberts, Fresno, for Defendant and Respondent Blue Ridge Insurance Company.