BLOCK v. GOLDEN EAGLE INS. CORP., B166460
Plaintiff's contention that defendant has a duty to defend her against an eminent domain action to condemn her property in fee simple is rejected where the eminent domain proceeding is not a claim made by another, as mentioned in the insurance policy, that triggers coverage.
- Decided 07/30/2004
- Published 07/30/2004
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Law Offices of James T. Hudson and James T. Hudson, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Barger & Wolen, Gregory O. Eisenreich and Jennifer S. Yu, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Golden Eagle Insurance Corporation., Ault, Davis & Schonfeld and R. Michael Jordan for Defendant and Respondent Clarendon Insurance Company., McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, Paul J. O'Rourke, Brandon M. Fish and Constance E. Roberts, Fresno, for Defendant and Respondent Blue Ridge Insurance Company.