NYULASSY v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP., H026704
The district court's denial of defendant's motion to compel arbitration is affirmed on grounds that it is unconscionable where it lacks any degree of mutuality, imposes upon plaintiff a prearbitration resolution procedure controlled by defendant, and severely limits the time within which plaintiff may demand arbitration to vindicate his rights.
- Decided 07/27/2004
- Published 07/27/2004
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellees:
- Michele C. Coyle, David R. Singer, Los Angeles, Hogan & Hartson, Attorneys for Defendant and Appellant., Randall M. Widmann, Palo Alto, Law Office of Randall M. Widmann, Attorney for Plaintiff and Respondent.