Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


IN RE DANIEL G., B167064

In a gang-related gun case, the Court found sufficient evidence to support a charge of possession of an assault weapon, but reversed a gang-loitering charge because there was no evidence to lead to an inference that defendant was intimidating others or publicizing his gang.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/16/2004
  • Published 07/16/2004

Judges

  • RUBIN, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  •  Sandra L. Waite, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Rancho Cucamonga, for Defendant and Appellant.,  Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Steven D. Matthews and Allison H. Chung, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard