California Court of Appeal

Trial court did not err when it denied a writ seeking to set aside approval of a development project because defendant town did comply with mandatory provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/02/2004
• Published 07/02/2004

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Johnson & Sedlack, Raymond W. Johnson and Carl T. Sedlack, Temecula, CA, for Plaintiff and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Richard M. Frank, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Theodora Berger, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Craig C. Thompson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Susan L. Durbin, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Singer & Coffin and M. Neil Singer, Irvine, CA, for Defendant and Respondent., Gresham, Savage, Nolan & Tilden, John C. Nolan and Jennifer M. Guenther, San Bernardino, CA, for Real Party in Interest and Respondent., Morrison & Foerster, Michael H. Zischke, San Francisco, CA, Donna R. Black, Los Angeles, CA, Scott B. Birkey, San Francisco, CA, and Kristin M. Kellet, Los Angeles, CA, for League of California Cities as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.