California Court of Appeal

Because defendant established that its chemical poses no significant risk of causing cancer in humans, defendant was entitled to a judgment declaring that it was exempt from Proposition 65 warning requirements.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/01/2004
• Published 07/01/2004

Judges

• SCOTLAND, P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
•  Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Richard M. Frank, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Theodora Berger, Assistant Attorney General, Craig C. Thompson, Susan L. Durbin, Janill L. Richards and Edward G. Weil, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Appellants., Adams Nye SinunuBruni Becht and Bruce Nye, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Respondent.