California Court of Appeal

The trial court erred in issuing a remedy for the apparent violation of a protective order, where it entered several orders prohibiting plaintiffs and their counsel from contacting certain third party witnesses without court permission, because the orders limited the constitutional rights of plaintiffs and their counsel without legal justification.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/29/2004
• Published 06/29/2004

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
•  Parilla, Militzok, Shedden & Garber, Paul H. Parilla, Irvine, Marc Ettinger;  Law Offices of Jefferey B. Lurner and Jefferey B. Lurner for Petitioners., O'Melveny & Myers, Michael G. Yoder and Amy J. Laurendeau, Newport Beach, for Real Parties in Interest.


• For Appellees:
  
• No appearance for Respondent.