California Court of Appeal

In a case arising out of disciplinary proceedings against plaintiff doctor that culminated in the termination of his staff privileges and membership, the court denied administrative mandamus because defendant's board applied a correct standard in making its decision, and no conflict of interest was proven.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/28/2004
• Published 06/28/2004

Judges

• CURRY, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
•  Silver & Field, Lawrence Silver and Mark E. Field, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant., Catherine I. Hanson, San Francisco, and Gregory M. Abrams for California Medical Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
•  Bingham McCutchen, Susan L. Hoffman, Elizabeth Van Horn, Hwannie Lee, Los Angeles;  Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Robin Meadow and Michael D. Fitts for Defendant and Respondent., Horvitz & Levy, David M. Axelrad and Robert H. Wright, Encino, for California Healthcare Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.