BFGC ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC. v. FORCUM/MACKEY CONSTR., INC, G032543
In a construction contract dispute, the lower court did not err by holding that plaintiff's claims for implied indemnity required a predicate tort.
- Decided 06/22/2004
- Published 06/22/2004
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Collins, Collins, Muir & Stewart, Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline C. Pons-Bunney and Douglas Fee for Cross-complainant and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Lang, Richert & Patch, Val W. Saldana and Tracy E. Sagle Benneyan for Cross-defendant and Respondent Forcum/Mackey Construction, Inc., Case, Ibrahim & Clauss, Brian S. Case, Costa Mesa, F. Albert Ibrahim, Mark R. Guevara and Andrew C. Carlton for Cross-defendant and Respondent S.C. Anderson, Inc.