California Court of Appeal

Court found there was a triable issue of fact as to whether Defendant Phone Company was guilty of fraudulent concealment by failing to disclose changes made to plaintiff's phone service, a practice commonly known as "slamming."

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/03/2004
• Published 06/03/2004

Judges

• MORRISON, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
•  Mark C. Barulich for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Watson, Khachadourian & Iams and Kevin R. Iams for Defendant and Respondent.