California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

PEOPLE v. JOHNSON, G032076

Defendant was entitled to an in camera inspection of responsive documents under Evidence Code section 1045 because his Pitchess motion satisfied the requirements of section 1043.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/04/2004
  • Published 05/04/2004

Judges

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  •  Betty A. Haight, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Robert M. Foster and Melissa A. Mandel, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard