PEOPLE v. JOHNSON, G032076
Defendant was entitled to an in camera inspection of responsive documents under Evidence Code section 1045 because his Pitchess motion satisfied the requirements of section 1043.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/04/2004
- Published 05/04/2004
Judges
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Betty A. Haight, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Robert M. Foster and Melissa A. Mandel, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.