California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

KAPNER v. MEADOWLARK RANCH ASS'N, B163525

Plaintiff has not acquired a prescriptive easement over the areas that he enclosed and took possession of by his improvements. The law does not allow parties who have possessed land to ignore the statutory requirement for paying taxes by claiming a prescriptive easement.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/17/2004
  • Published 03/17/2004

Judges

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  •  Gary R. Ricks and Brigham J. Ricks, Santa Barbara, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Kay S. Kuns, Santa Ynez, for Defendant and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard