KAPNER v. MEADOWLARK RANCH ASS'N, B163525
Plaintiff has not acquired a prescriptive easement over the areas that he enclosed and took possession of by his improvements. The law does not allow parties who have possessed land to ignore the statutory requirement for paying taxes by claiming a prescriptive easement.
- Decided 03/17/2004
- Published 03/17/2004
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Gary R. Ricks and Brigham J. Ricks, Santa Barbara, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Kay S. Kuns, Santa Ynez, for Defendant and Respondent.