California Court of Appeal

Defendant has failed to make the necessary prima facie showing that his activity came within the protection of the anti-SLAPP statute. It is thus unnecessary to determine whether plaintiff established the probable validity of his fraud claims.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/04/2004
• Published 03/04/2004

Judges

• HUFFMAN, Acting P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
•  Estes & Hoyt and Kevin J. Hoyt, San Diego, for Defendant and Appellant., Vivoli & Associates, Michael W. Vivoli and Matthew J. Yarling for Plaintiff and Respondent.