California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

CITY OF SARATOGA v. HINZ, H023549

Defendant unsuccessfully appeals a judgment rejecting his challenges to plaintiff's resolution of necessity condemning an easement over a portion of defendant's property as part of a road improvement project. Trial court correctly found that the limitations period in Street and Highways Code section 10400 bars defendant from asserting the invalidity defense.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/20/2004
  • Published 02/20/2004

Judges

  • RUSHING, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  •   Berliner Cohen, Paul A. Pelosi, San Jose, for Defendant and Appellant Lester F. Hinz, Jr., Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Michael R. Nave, San Leandro, Stefanie Y. Gandolfi, Oakland, for Plaintiff and Respondents City of Saratoga.
Copied to clipboard