CITY OF SARATOGA v. HINZ, H023549
Defendant unsuccessfully appeals a judgment rejecting his challenges to plaintiff's resolution of necessity condemning an easement over a portion of defendant's property as part of a road improvement project. Trial court correctly found that the limitations period in Street and Highways Code section 10400 bars defendant from asserting the invalidity defense.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/20/2004
- Published 02/20/2004
Judges
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Berliner Cohen, Paul A. Pelosi, San Jose, for Defendant and Appellant Lester F. Hinz, Jr., Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Michael R. Nave, San Leandro, Stefanie Y. Gandolfi, Oakland, for Plaintiff and Respondents City of Saratoga.