California Court of Appeal
IN RE MARRIAGE OF CHAKKO, B166116
When father refused to comply with a court order to provide discovery on his finances for purposes of calculating his child support obligation, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declaring his income to be $40,000 per month and precluding him from offering any evidence to the contrary.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/22/2004
- Published 01/22/2004
Judges
- YEGAN, J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Patrick G. Cherry,Taylor, McCord & Prayer, Ventura; Donna C. Santo and Patricia H. Lamas, Law Offices of Donna C. Santo, Ventura, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, James M. Humes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Thomas M. Humes, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Barbara L. Sheldon, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent Ventura County Child Support Services., No appearance by Respondent Asha Chakko.