California Court of Appeal

Defendant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and of due process violation for termination of her Proposition 36 probation are both meritless. Superior court committed a minor error in setting defendant's restitution fine.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/12/2003
• Published 12/12/2003

Judges

• NARES, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
•  Beatrice C. Tillman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Karl T. Terp and Marvin E. Mizell, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.