California Court of Appeal

Silva was not "in actual custody" within the meaning of Penal Code section 4019 when he was on his electronic home monitoring program. He was therefore not entitled to presentence conduct credits under that section.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/10/2003
• Published 12/10/2003

Judges

•  SIMS, Acting P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
•  Linda J. Zachritz, Fresno, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Bradford R. Fenocchio, District Attorney, Thomas H. Beattie and Peggy C. Turner, Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.