California Court of Appeal

Defendant's appeal contending his conviction for criminal threats must be reversed as CA Penal Code section 422 is unconstitutionally vague is affirmed. Penal Code section 422 was held to be sufficiently certain and definite to withstand a facial vagueness challenge.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/24/2003
• Published 11/24/2003

Judges

• GRIGNON, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
•  Edward J. Haggerty,City of Industry, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Marc E. Turchin, Michael C. Keller and Richard S. Moskowitz, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.