MARTINEZ v. METABOLIFE INT'L, INC., d040279
The district court's denial of defendant's motion to strike plaintiffs' complaint under the anti-SLAPP statute is affirmed where the complaint alleges garden-variety personal injury claims is not based on, and does not arise from, protected activity as defined by section 425.16.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/12/2003
- Published 11/12/2003
Judges
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Higgs, Fletcher & Mack, John Morris, William A. Low, Susan M. Hack, San Diego; Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Rex S. Heinke and Jonathan Gottlieb, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant., Law Offices of Christopher E. Grell, Christopher E. Grell, Oakland, and Ian P. Dillon for Plaintiffs and Respondents.