ROBERTS v. LAMONTO, c041900
Summary judgment to defendant reversed where defendant, who was at all times acting as plaintiff's agent and owed him a fiduciary duty, breached that duty by refusing to disclose the details of the assignment transaction.
- Decided 11/03/2003
- Published 11/03/2003
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Hansen, Boyd, Culhane & Watson; Boyd & Kimball and Betsy S. Kimball, Sacramento; Banks & Watson, Lawrence R. Watson and James O. Moses, Sacramento, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Montague & Viglione and John D. Montague, Sacramento; Haley & Bilheimer, Allan S. Haley, Nevada City, and John Bilheimer for Defendant and Respondent.