California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

ROBERTS v. LAMONTO, c041900

Summary judgment to defendant reversed where defendant, who was at all times acting as plaintiff's agent and owed him a fiduciary duty, breached that duty by refusing to disclose the details of the assignment transaction.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/03/2003
  • Published 11/03/2003

Judges

  • SIMS, Acting P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  •  Hansen, Boyd, Culhane & Watson;  Boyd & Kimball and Betsy S. Kimball, Sacramento;  Banks & Watson, Lawrence R. Watson and James O. Moses, Sacramento, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Montague & Viglione and John D. Montague, Sacramento;  Haley & Bilheimer, Allan S. Haley, Nevada City, and John Bilheimer for Defendant and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard