Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


ROBERTS v. LAMONTO, c041900

Summary judgment to defendant reversed where defendant, who was at all times acting as plaintiff's agent and owed him a fiduciary duty, breached that duty by refusing to disclose the details of the assignment transaction.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/03/2003
  • Published 11/03/2003

Judges

  • SIMS, Acting P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  •  Hansen, Boyd, Culhane & Watson;  Boyd & Kimball and Betsy S. Kimball, Sacramento;  Banks & Watson, Lawrence R. Watson and James O. Moses, Sacramento, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Montague & Viglione and John D. Montague, Sacramento;  Haley & Bilheimer, Allan S. Haley, Nevada City, and John Bilheimer for Defendant and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard