California Court of Appeal

Summary judgment to defendant is affirmed where 1) as a criminal defendant, plaintiff had no constitutional right to counsel in habeas corpus proceedings, and consequently, no right to effective assistance of counsel, and 2) plaintiff did not establish his actual innocence in a postconviction proceeding.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/30/2003
• Published 10/30/2003

Judges

• HUFFMAN, Acting P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
•  Lindsel Ateur Redante, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Carmela F. Simoncini, San Diego, CA, for Defendants and Respondents.