POLIBRID COATINGS, INC. v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, G032459
Denial of a defendant's motion to continue is reversed and a mandate issued directing the trial court to grant a motion to continue the trial for at least six months where state fast track rules must give way to the statutory right to bring a summary judgment motion.
- Decided 10/22/2003
- Published 10/22/2003
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Pamela Dunn, Dunn Koes LLP, Pasadena, Mark Albert Mellor, Mellor Law Firm, Riverside, for Petitioner Polibrid Coatings, Inc., Lisa Anne Stolzy, Gresham Savage et al LLP, Riverside, Jordan Neal Gray, Lewis D'Amato et al LLP, San Bernardino, for Real Party in Interest KNK Painting & Coating, Inc., David Lawrence Lynch, Robins Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP, Los Angeles, for Real Party in Interest Surety and Indemnity Company, Developers., Bernard S. Kamine, Phyllis Ungerer, Kamine Ungerer LLP, Los Angeles, for Real Party in Interest SSC Construction., Thomas B. Wait, Wait & Childs, Claremont, for Real Party in Interest Carboline., Robert A. Olson, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Los Angeles, for Association of Southern California Defense Counsel as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.
- For Appellees:
- No appearance for Respondent.