California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

NJD, LTD. v. CITY OF SAN DIMAS, B160784

Trial judge did not abuse her discretion in denying plaintiff's motion to present the proffered evidence in support of its facial challenge to Amendment 99-1, a land use regulation. There was no error in finding the city had complied with the procedural and information disclosure requirements of the CEQA.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/31/2003
  • Published 07/31/2003

Judges

  •  TURNER, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  •  Newmeyer & Dillion, Newport Beach, Karen J. Lee and Paul L. Starita for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Vicki E. Land, Mark W. Steres and Tracy M. Noonan, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents.
Copied to clipboard