Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


IN RE DANIEL M., D041470

Because appellant did not acknowledge or establish his paternity (25 U.S.C. section 1903(9); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 1439(a)(4)), he lacks standing to assert that the juvenile court committed reversible error by not complying with the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/16/2003
  • Published 07/16/2003

Judges

  •  McCONNELL, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Suzanne F. Evans, San Diego, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minor.

  • For Appellees:
  •  Alice C. Shotton, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., John J. Sansone, County Counsel, Susan Strom, Chief Deputy County Counsel, Lisa Maldonado, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard