BEACH v. HARCO NAT'L INS. CO., C039243
Arbitration in an uninsured motorist proceeding did not involve petitioning within the meaning of the anti-SLAPP statute, and permitting anti-SLAPP motions in this context would "completely emasculate" Insurance Code section 790.03(h), which outlines unfair claims settlement practices.
- Decided 07/03/2003
- Published 07/03/2003
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellees:
- Mark E. Ellis, Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant and Appellant., Dreyer, Babich, Buccola & Callaham and Eliot M. Reiner, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff and Respondent.