ZAMOS v. STROUD, B160484
Plaintiffs met their burden to demonstrate a reasonable probability that their malicious prosecution claim would succeed against an attorney defendant because an attorney may be liable for malicious prosecution if the attorney continues to prosecute a lawsuit after discovery of facts showing that the lawsuit has no merit.
- Decided 07/02/2003
- Published 07/02/2003
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Law Offices of Jerome Zamos and Jerome Zamos, Woodland Hills, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Stroud & Do and James T. Stroud, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents.