California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

ZAMOS v. STROUD, B160484

Plaintiffs met their burden to demonstrate a reasonable probability that their malicious prosecution claim would succeed against an attorney defendant because an attorney may be liable for malicious prosecution if the attorney continues to prosecute a lawsuit after discovery of facts showing that the lawsuit has no merit.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/02/2003
  • Published 07/02/2003


  • MOSK, J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Law Offices of Jerome Zamos and Jerome Zamos, Woodland Hills, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Stroud & Do and James T. Stroud, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents.
Copied to clipboard