California Court of Appeal
PEOPEL v. RAMIREZ, B158771
Where appellant did not demur or raise any objection to the accusatory pleading in the trial court, his contention, that the court erred by imposing a mandatory consecutive term of five years for leaving the accident scene (Veh. Code section 20001(c)) because the felony complaint did not specifically allege Section 20001(c) or adequate notice of the mandatory consecutive five year term, is denied.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/12/2003
- Published 06/12/2003
Judges
- YEGAN, Acting P.J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Wayne C. Tobin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Mary Sanchez, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Herbert S. Tetef, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.