Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


PEOPEL v. RAMIREZ, B158771

Where appellant did not demur or raise any objection to the accusatory pleading in the trial court, his contention, that the court erred by imposing a mandatory consecutive term of five years for leaving the accident scene (Veh. Code section 20001(c)) because the felony complaint did not specifically allege Section 20001(c) or adequate notice of the mandatory consecutive five year term, is denied.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/12/2003
  • Published 06/12/2003

Judges

  • YEGAN, Acting P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  •  Wayne C. Tobin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Mary  Sanchez, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Herbert S. Tetef, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard