California Court of Appeal

In a toxic contamination case brought pursuant to Proposition 65, the trial court did not correctly apply the delayed discovery rule to the facts and consequently erred in denying defendant's motion for summary judgment with respect to the 28 personal injury plaintiffs.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/22/2003
• Published 05/22/2003

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Holme Roberts & Owen and Linnea Brown, Denver, CO;  Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Robert S. Warren, Robert W. Loewen, Irvine, and David A. Battaglia, Los Angeles, for Petitioner., Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack, Walter J. Lack, Elizabeth L. Crooke, Gary A. Praglin, Richard P. Kinnan;  Girardi & Keese, Thomas V. Girardi, Los Angeles, and Howard B. Miller, El Segundo, for Real Parties in Interest.


• For Appellees:
  
• No appearance for Respondent.