California Court of Appeal

Plaintiff's employment contract claims are all preempted by federal law pursuant to Section 301 of the NLRA. Denial of plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint to conform to proof was not an abuse of discretion, and in any event did not prejudice plaintiff, because his proposed amendment would not have cured the preemption problem.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/14/2003
• Published 05/14/2003

Judges

• RUVOLO, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
•  Towner Law Offices and Bruce M. Towner, San Francisco, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Littler Mendelson, Robert G. Hulteng, San Francisco, and Sheila M. Kiernan, for Respondents.