California Court of Appeal

Where a juvenile court determined that reasonable visitation should take place, it was not an impermissible delegation of judicial authority to permit a guardian to use her judgment in making sure the frequency and duration of visits are in the children's best interests, consistent with their developmental needs.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/09/2003
• Published 05/09/2003

Judges

• PREMO, Acting P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Ann Miller Ravel, County Counsel, Teri L. Robinson, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff/Respondent Santa Clara County Department of Family and Children's Services., George W. Kennedy, District Attorney, Robert J. Masterson, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent Children J.H. et al., Sixth District Appellate Program, Jonathan Grossman, Stockton, for Defendant/Appellant S.G.