DEP'T OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT & HOUSING v. VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC., G029912
Plaintiff's state law claim, seeking to be paid for her time off after four weeks, is substantially dependent on an interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement, for purposes of preemption by section 301 of the federal Labor Management Relations Act of 1947.
- Decided 04/28/2003
- Published 04/28/2003
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellees:
- Swerdlow Florence Sanchez & Rathbun, Janet I. Swerdlow; and Michael C. Levine for Defendant and Appellant., Paul R. Ramsey, Chief Counsel, Joseph H. Duff and Bert Bresticker, Senior Staff Counsel, and James A. Otto, Staff Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.