Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

California Court of Appeal


SCOGNAMILLO v. HERRICK, B155744

A default judgement is reversed in part because a portion of the damage award was not supported by sufficient evidence, and because the trial court failed to reduce to present cash value the portion of the award representing future medical expenses and lost earnings.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/10/2003
  • Published 03/10/2003

Judges

  • CHARLES S. VOGEL, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  •  Horvitz & Levy, David M. Axelrad, Encino, and Karen M. Bray;  Millard, Pilchowski, Holweger, Child & Marton, Los Angeles, Andrew J. Marton and Russell W. Schatz, for Defendants and Appellants., Law Office of Scott D. Dinsmore and Scott D. Dinsmore, Manhattan Beach, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard