California Court of Appeal

Substantial evidence supported findings of Interference With Prospective Economic Advantage and Interference With Contractual Relations, where two attorneys, who left a firm, encouraged 144 clients to move to their new firm, and engaged in other misconduct.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/20/2003
• Published 02/20/2003

Judges

• CURRY, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Dwyer, Daly, Brotzen & Bruno, Toni Rae Bruno, Los Angeles, and Marlin D. Wall, Woodland Hills, for Defendants and Appellants., Arter & Hadden, David Gurnick, Sue Bendavid-Arbiv, Woodland Hills;  Robert L. Reeves & Associates, Robert L. Reeves, Pasadena, Robert J. DuPont and Richard M. Wilner, Long Beach, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.