California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

MACKEY v. DEP'T OF CORRECTIONS, C040262

Beyond a prison warden's preferential treatment of his paramours, prison employees did not show a concerted pattern of harassment sufficiently pervasive to have altered the conditions of their employment on the basis of sex. Retaliation claims were not actionable where plaintiffs did not engage in protected activity.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/28/2003
  • Published 01/28/2003

Judges

  • HULL, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Lawless & Lawless, Barbara A. Lawless, San Francisco, and Aelish M. Joyce, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Jacob Appelsmith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Vincent J. Scally, Jr., and Timothy G. Yeung, Deputies Attorney General, for Defendants and Respondents.
Copied to clipboard