California Court of Appeal

Evidence was sufficient to support convictions for 1) forgery, based on a fraudulent purchase agreement, and 2) the fraudulent uttering of a check, where defendant told the victim to resubmit the check after previously telling her there were insufficient funds to cover it.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/06/2002
• Published 12/06/2002

Judges

• BENKE, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
•  Gary V. Crooks, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, San Francisco, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Steven T. Oetting and Teresa Torreblanca, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.