Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

California Court of Appeal


MARIN HEALTHCARE DIST. v. SUTTER HEALTH, C034127

The judicially created doctrine, enunciated in Hoadley v. San Francisco 50 Cal. 265 (1875), that the statute of limitations does not apply to actions by the state to recover property dedicated for public use against an adverse possessor, has no application to a lease of property which the state is authorized to make.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/14/2002
  • Published 11/14/2002

Judges

  • KOLKEY, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  •  Steefel, Levitt & Weiss, Stephen S. Mayne, San Francisco, and David T. Vanalek, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • McDonough, Holland & Allen, Richard E. Brandt, Sacramento, for Defendant and Respondent Sutter Health., Keegin, Harrison, Schoppert & Smith, Jeffrey S. Schoppert and Wendy L. Wyse, San Rafael, for Defendants and Respondents Marin General Hospital and Marin Community Health.
Copied to clipboard