SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING CO. v. GLEDSON/CASHMAN CONSTR., INC., B152582
Settlement documents were not enforceable as settlement agreements, as defined in Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6, because they were merely unilateral offers to settle that were revoked prior to their acceptance, and although they were later signed by the offering party, they were not signed in the manner contemplated by Section 664.6.
- Decided 10/25/2002
- Published 10/25/2002
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Lanak & Hanna, Craig P. Bronstein, Santa Ana, and William J. Allard, West Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Appellants Sully-Miller Contracting Company and Hanson Aggregates West, Inc.
- For Appellees:
- Hunter, Molloy & Salcido, John Logan Hunter, Pasadena, and Richard Salcido, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Gledson/Cashman Construction, Inc., J. Michael Pisias, Jr., San Francisco, for Defendant and Respondent Ulico Casualty Company.