California Court of Appeal

Following remand from the Supreme Court of California, evidence was sufficient to support a finding that defendant had a commercial purpose when engaging a minor to participate in pornography, and therefore was sufficient to support his conviction under Penal Code section 311.4(b).

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/25/2002
• Published 10/25/2002

Judges

• KREMER, P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
•  Gregory Marshall, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, David P. Druliner, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Janelle M. Boustanyand Arlene Aquintey Sevidal, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.