IN RE CELINE R., F040063
A new statutory exception based upon sibling relationships, Welfare & Institutions Code section 366.26 (c)(1)(E), to the presumption that adoption is the preferred permanent plan for dependent children, does not impose a duty on either the court or the social services agency to address its applicability.
- Decided 09/30/2002
- Published 09/30/2002
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- John L. Dodd, Tustin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- B.C. Barmann, Sr., County Counsel and Susan M. Gill, Deputy County Counsel, Plaintiff and Respondent., No appearance for Defendants and Respondents.