California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

PEOPLE v. BOWDEN, B151167

A finding of a prior "strike" is upheld, because the prosecution was not required to prove that a prior robbery was committed while a juvenile was armed with a deadly weapon, as present crimes were committed after Proposition 21 deleted that requirement in former Welfare & Institutions Code section 707(b).

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/24/2002
  • Published 09/24/2002

Judges

  • CHARLES S. VOGEL, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  •  Jeffrey H. Leo, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant James Bowden., Waldemar D. Halka, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Vacarro Webster., David A. Kay, San Diego, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Antwon Tennant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Katz, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Ronald A. Jakob and Robert David Breton, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard