California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

IN RE OSCAR R., B151004

When a juvenile who, after the enactment of Welfare & Institutions Code amended section 777, engages in conduct alleged to violate his probation, application of that section to a probation revocation hearing does not violate ex post facto provisions, even though the original offense occurred prior to enactment of the statute.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/12/2002
  • Published 09/12/2002

Judges

  • ASHMANN-GERST, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Gerson Simon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Theresa A. Cochrane, and Catherine T. Okawa Kohm, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard