ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INS. CO. v. AM. DYNASTY SURPLUS LINES INS. CO., B148904
The mere presence on the jobsite of a subcontractor's employee is not sufficient to constitute an act or omission on its part, and the liability of a contractor, covered by an additional insured endorsement in a policy issued to the subcontractor, did not arise from the subcontractor's ongoing operations.
- Decided 09/05/2002
- Published 09/05/2002
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- The Claypool Law Firm, APC and Brian E. Claypool, Los Angeles, for Appellant Sasco Electric.
- For Appellees:
- Neumeyer & Boyd, LLP, Carol Boyd and Larry Nathenson, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.