California Court of Appeal

In a legal malpractice action, attorneys failed to demonstrate that they conducted sufficient research and analysis to have exercised informed judgment under the judgmental immunity doctrine; claims (except one) are barred by the statute of limitations (Code of Civil Procedure section 340.6).

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/09/2002
• Published 08/09/2002

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
•  Hunt, Ortmann, Blasco, Palffy & Rossell and Omel A. Nieves, Pasadena, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Robie & Matthai, Pamela E. Dunn, Kyle Kveton and Gabrielle M. Jackson, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Appellants Martin B. Greenbaum, Dennis Ferentz and Greenbaum & Ferentz., Haight, Brown & Bonesteel, Bruce Cleeland, Santa Ana, and Jules S. Zeman, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Raymond King., Hollins & Fields, Byron S. Hollins, Howard M. Fields, Encino, and Barton E. DeBolt for Defendant and Respondent The Coulombe Law Firm.