Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


ROSS v. CREEL PRINTING & PUBL'G, INC., A095949

Allegations that an attorney violated the Rules of Professional Conduct is not sufficient to satisfy the outrageous conduct necessary to state a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/29/2002
  • Published 07/29/2002

Judges

  • GEMELLO, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  •  The Bernstein Law Group, Marc N. Bernstein, San Francisco, Counsel for plaintiff and appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, W. Bruce Wold, Frederick D. Baker, Kathryn H. Edwards, Cassandra T. Holman, San Francisco, Counsel for defendants and respondents.
Copied to clipboard