California Court of Appeal

Statutes requiring that agendas be prepared and commented on, for certain educational programs, do not necessarily constitute a reimbursable state mandate under the California Constitution, unless test claimants had no reasonable alternative or choice not to participate in the programs at issue.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/17/2002
• Published 07/17/2002

Judges

• DAVIS, Acting P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Manuel M. Medeiros, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Andrea Lynn Hoch, Louis R. Mauro and Leslie R. Lopez, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Camille Shelton, Sacramento, for Defendant and Respondent., Jo Anne Sawyerknoll, Sacramento, and Jose A. Gonzales, San Diego, for Real Party in Interest and Respondent San Diego Unified School District., No appearance by Real Parties in Interest and Respondents Kern High School District and County of Santa Clara.