California Court of Appeal

Summary judgment against the assignee of a lease was improper, where the court erroneously considered a supplemental declaration in support of the motion, which was first submitted with the moving party's reply, and triable facts existed as to whether a "right of first refusal" condition was satisfied.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/03/2002
• Published 06/03/2002

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
•  Raitt & Associates and G. Emmett Raitt, Jr., Irvine, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Snell & Wilmer, Richard A. Derevan, Irvine, and Athena Roussos for Defendant and Respondent.