California Court of Appeal

Eviction from county fair for a dress code violation did not deprive appellant of full and fair access to accommodations in violation of the Unruh Act, but the dress code was void for vagueness and facially overbroad, and its enforcement against appellant deprived him of a liberty interest in personal dress and appearance.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/23/2002
• Published 05/23/2002

Judges

• KLINE, P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
•  S teven M. Woodside, County Counsel, Gregory T. Dion, Deputy County Counsel, County of Sonoma, Santa Rosa, CA, Attorneys for Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Joseph J. Wiseman, Law Offices of Joseph J. Wiseman, Petaluma, CA, Harris B. Taback, Law Offices of Harris B. Taback, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Respondent.