California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

GRAY v. STEWART, a095941

Because the offer to compromise did not prescribe any specific mode of communication of the acceptance, the only requirement was that the acceptance be communicated in a clear and unequivocal fashion, and absence of service of acceptance of a settlement offer did not render the acceptance invalid.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/30/2002
  • Published 04/30/2002




  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  •  Anderlini, Finkelstein & Emerick, P. Terry Anderlini, Anne K. Brauer, San Mateo, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Willard L. Alloway & Associates, Oakland, Jeanette N. Little, Robert L. Jackson, Santa Rosa, for Respondents.
Copied to clipboard