California Court of Appeal

Absent appellant's admission that his conviction constituted a probation violation, under the circumstances appellant is entitled to the benefits of Proposition 36, and his probation should not have been revoked.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/24/2002
• Published 04/24/2002

Judges

• MIRIAM A. VOGEL, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Carol S. Boyk, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Margaret E. Maxwell and Marc J. Nolan, Supervising Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.