California Court of Appeal

Under the plain terms of an indemnity agreement, each signatory was jointly and severally liable for the losses sustained by Surety as a result of its issuance of bonds to the City to guarantee defendant's work, thus the trial court erred in exempting one defendant from the indemnity agreement on statute of limitations grounds.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/03/2002
• Published 04/03/2002

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
•  Floratos, Loll & Devine and Daniel D. White, Irvine, for Defendant, Cross-defendant and Appellant., Law Offices of Hausman & Sosa, Carlos E. Sosa and Larry D. Stratton, Encino, for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent., Jimmy L. Gutierrez, City Attorney;  Arturo N. Fiero for Plaintiff and Respondent.