SCHOENDORF v. U.D. REGISTRY, INC., B146918
Where plaintiff made a sufficient showing that defendant, a consumer reporting agency that specializes in unlawful detainer cases, should have modified her report even if the additional information was not contained in public records, granting defendant's motion to strike was error.
- Decided 03/28/2002
- Published 03/28/2002
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Faye A. Schoendorf, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Enenstein, Russell & Saltz, Michael J. Saltz, Jason M. Russell and Darren S. Enenstein for Defendant and Respondent U.D. Registry, Inc., Harvey A. Saltz, in pro. per., for Defendant and Respondent.